In my efforts to become a Canadian, I've been serious, earnest, dedicated, studious and acquired a whole lot of other qualities that I didn't really think were of any use to me.
In addition, I did a whole lot of things that would turn me into a Canadian.
After two years and more of being at it, I was fairly certain that I was well on my way to being a Canadian.
Then, my son gently broke the sad news that I’m nowhere near being a Canadian. According to him, I’ll never be a Canadian because I speak English like Russell Peters’ father – with a pronounced Indian accent. And he mimicked Peters' famous, "hodog" line.
So, I finally decided to call off my efforts at becoming Canadian because I was pretty much sure I could never succeed.
Just then, I got hold of Brothers Ferguson’s How to Be a Canadian. The brothers – Will and Ian – have written a book that is serious education. In one week, I now know everything that I need to know to become a Canadian.
Of course, the book doesn’t teach me the accent, but short of that, it’s indeed a ready guide to all things Canadian – How to talk like a Canadian, How to watch TV like a Canadian, How to eat like a Canadian, so on and so forth.
While reading the guide, I got this feeling that everything had been written in a sort of larger than life, hyperbolic style.
Having lived in Toronto since 2008 and being constantly engaged in trying to learn yet another way to become a Canadian, I have become extremely serious and I realise I've lost my sense of humour, somewhat.
I’m not alone. The constant need to be politically correct in a multicultural society deprives most Canadians of a sense of humour and the ability to laugh, a stray Russell Peters notwithstanding.
It was towards the end of the guide, when I came across the following passage that I was really confused and asked my son. He took one look at the cover and said, it a funny book, father. You're supposed to read it to enjoy and laugh.
Well, I'll be damned. Anyways, Here's passage. And, now that I realise the book is humourous, I'll read it again.
Chart: Clip ‘n’ Save
A Handy Chart for Aspiring Novelists (Or, How to Get a Cozy Review)
Plot: No
Cryptic dialogue: Yes
Cryptic dialogue hinting at a dark past betrayal: Yes
Was it incest? Probably.
Female character as empowered victim: Yes.
Healing: Yes, but only at the end.
Humour: No.
Irony: Yes.
Characters who spend most of their time remembering things that happened to them before the book actually started: Yes.
Isn’t the concept of an “empowered victim” an oxymoron? Shhh.
No comments:
Post a Comment