Earlier this month, India celebrated the centenary
of Mahatma Gandhi’s return from South Africa on January 7 1915. Mohandas
Karamchand Gandhi left Porbunder in 1893 to practice law in South Africa, but
fate and circumstances turned him into a leader of his people as he discovered
new ways to oppose oppression.
Many have commented in the last few weeks on how
the South African sojourn turned Gandhi into Mahatma, and here are the links to
some of the better pieces:
In Gandhi Before India, historian Ramchandra Guha while describing
Gandhi’s last days in South Africa records:
These wishes
and felicitations provide a conspectus of the social and geographical range of
Gandhi’s influence in the large, complex and conflicted land that, for two
decades, was his home.
It may be
apposite, however, to juxtapose to these endorsements a comment on Gandhi’s
departure from someone who was not sorry to see him go. This was General Jan
Christian Smuts. In May 1914 Smuts received a letter from Emily Hobhouse, who
was now back in London. This conveyed news about mutual friends, and went on to
discuss a man whom the Quaker now considered a friend but whom the Afrikaner
still could not. “I have been reading Gandhi’s Home Rule for India – Hind Swaraj,
wrote Hobhouse to Smuts. ‘Have you read it? I like it very much, all about India and the harm English civilization is
doing there…It is a book you would have enjoyed at one period of your life.’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c09/b6c09abcf1d4826155042657121abba774592d44" alt=""
Smut’s reply
is unrecorded. Whatever he might have thought of the English on the
battlefield, after the war ended he had been first in the ranks of those
seeking to unite the white people against the coloured. Hobhouse’s endorsement
of Gandhi’s attack on Western civilization could scarcely have pleased him. In
recent years he had read and seen too much of the man in any case. His feelings
are contained in a letter he wrote to Sir Benjamin Robertson, where he said
that after the Viceroy’s representative had returned to India, ‘Gandhi
approached me on a number of small administrative points. some of which I could
meet him on, and as a result, the saint has left our shores – I sincerely hope
for ever.’
Earlier, Guha quotes Lord
Gladstone’s description (to Colonial Office) about a meeting between Gandhi and
Smuts, which encapsulates in a few words the deep distrust the British always harboured
about Gandhi’s unique methods:
General Smuts has shown a most patient and conciliatory temper. In spite of a series of conflicts extending over many years, he retains a sympathetic interest in Gandhi as an unusual type of humanity, whose peculiarities, however inconvenient they may be to the Minister, are not devoid of attraction to the student…It is not easy task for a European to conduct negotiations with Mr. Gandhi. The workings of his conscience are inscrutable to the occidental mind and produce complications in wholly unexpected places. His ethical and intellectual attitude, based as it appears to be on a curious compound of mysticism and astuteness, baffles the ordinary processes of thought, Nevertheless, a tolerably practical understanding has been reached.
No comments:
Post a Comment