Friday, July 31, 2015
Subway to Downsview
I haven't seen her in here;
these
days she meditates
in
the traffic on the 401,
commuting
60 miles between home and work
but
I meet
that
part-timer from Walmart
–
a full-time artist
as
he furtively glances at
the
young woman’s
décolletage,
which seems
delighted
to be left
uncovered
in summer’s warmth
he
smiles at me, and nods
when
I peak into his notebook,
as
I get off at Lawrence West,
and
see two ripe breasts
dominating
the page
─
he’s sketched her in the nude
Epic Retold - Chindu Sreedharan
Ramayana and Mahabharata fascinate Indians across all times
and ages. I'm no exception. I'm no expert, and have read them only in
English translations (C. Rajgopalchari’s classic Ramayana and Mahabharata published
in 1951 by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan).
Of the two, Mahabharata is without doubt, more complex and infinitely
more interesting, because unlike in the Ramayana, where everyone is an epitome
of virtue, in Mahabharata everyone is utterly human; including gods; and none
of them are above pettiness, chicanery, and shenanigans.
I read Irawati Karve’s Yuganta more than three decades ago.
It tore down the epic of all heroism and interpreted the characters from a
secular point of view. Originally written in Marathi and then translated by the
Karve into English, Yuganta locates the epic in its historical time.
For instance, Karve notes, “What people eat, they offer to
their gods, and inversely whatever is offered to the gods is consumed by the
people. Horses and goats were certainly sacrificed then. And though cattle is
not mentioned as having been an item of offering, new archaeological evidence does
show that cattle too was used similarly. Does this mean that beef was eaten as
a matter of course and perhaps for that reason finds no special mention, while
game does?”
The last time I read the epic was with my son when he was
young enough to enjoy picture books. I doubt whether he remembers anything that
I read to him.
Earlier this year, I read Chindu Sreedharan’s Epic Retold.
It is Mahabharata for the social media generation. It’s a brilliant
interpretation of the epic, and a uniquely creative work because Sreedharan has
written the entire epic (supposedly the world’s longest poem) into a series of
140-characters twitter feeds.
The author, a former journalist, reinterprets the epic from
Bhima’s point of view, and portrays him as an anti-war advocate, disgusted with
the internecine palace intrigues, and one who prefers quality time by himself
in the forest. He is brave, strong and skilled, but clearly a reluctant
warrior. He is aware of his lowly status in the pecking order of the five
brothers, is aware that the younger brother Arjun is really the hero of the
epic, and dislikes the elder brother Yudhistira for his double standards and hypocrisy.
Sreedharan’s effort is breathtaking because he successfully
compresses the entire epic, without missing any important episode. When the
battle at Kurukshetra ends, after Ashwathma has set everyone and everything on
fire, Bhima sighs: “Is this what we fought for? I sink on to the sand under the
crushing weight of our victory.”
A couple of years back, I came across another interesting version of the two epics by Satvik Patel, who reinterpreted the epics in the form of Facebook status updates. Here are the links: Facebook-Ramayana, Facebook-Mahabharata.
Labels:
Chindu Sreedharan,
Epic Retold
Cosmopolis Toronto
Colin Boyd Shafer is a documentary photographer who came up
with the idea of defining the multicultural character of Toronto, arguably
Canada’s most multicultural city. And he did that in a unique manner – by photographing
a person from all the countries of the world now calling Toronto home.
He began the project by raising money through crowdfunding
in 2013. I saw his announcement on Facebook and responded immediately. In October
2013, Colin chose me to represent India. I was to decide the venue of the shoot
– a place that made me feel at home in Toronto. Without a second thought I told
him that place would be the Toronto Reference Library, because Toronto gave me
the opportunity to write fiction, be nearer to books, authors, reading and
writing. I began this blog in Toronto.
He also wanted me to get something from my city of birth that
was precious to me. I took a black and white photograph of Eros cinema probably
taken in the 1950s. To me it was representative of the time when Bombay was
truly cosmopolitan. Indeed, a time before my time, and a time about which I
have only read in books. I imagine Bombay in the 1950s was what Toronto is
today – utterly cosmopolitan in character.
At that time, there were people from all over the
subcontinent who called and made Bombay their home, just as today there are
people from all over the world who call and have made Toronto their home. I was
excited to be a part of the project, and eagerly participated in a promotional
video, which included the first batch of participants. It gave me an
opportunity to express my gratitude to a city that my family and I came to
without knowing anyone seven years ago in July 2008, and a city that welcomed
us, accepted us with open arms.
Earlier this week Colin released a book version of the
documentary at a simple launch ceremony in Toronto. His achievement is
staggering because he has managed to get people from more countries than any
official list. As he notes in the
introduction of the book, “Did I photograph one person from every country in
the world? I now know a definite count is elusive. Numbers used by United
Nations, the US State Department and the Olympic Games are all slightly
different. The question of territories or autonomous states was raised in that
people born in Palestine, Tibet, Scotland, Taiwan and Puerto Rico wanted to
represent what they consider to be their ‘home country’. Because inclusiveness is
germaine to this project Cosmopolis Toronto has more home nations than any
official list.”
Cosmopolis Toronto won at the 2014 Toronto Urban Photography
Festival and was presented at TEDx-Toronto 2014. It has been featured widely in
the media, including The Globe and Mail. The Wall Street Journal, and National
Geographic. Shafer won the 2013 Human Rights Watch Film Festival’s photography
competition and his work has been showcased in publications such as Doci, FStop
and Foto8 Magazine. Cosmopolis Toronto has been exhibited at various venues in
Toronto, including the 2015 Contact photography festival.
Labels:
Colin Boyd Shafer,
Cosmopolis Toronto
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Will the pendulum swing left?
My 500-word rant on the referendum in Greece
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932), Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon (1940), and George Orwell’s 1984 gave the world a glimpse of the dystopian transformation that Soviet-style communism was bringing about in the name of communism. These were among the first works of art to depict the reality of a state-controlled existence where “Big Brother is Watching” would be a matter of fact and not a disquieting aberration.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932), Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon (1940), and George Orwell’s 1984 gave the world a glimpse of the dystopian transformation that Soviet-style communism was bringing about in the name of communism. These were among the first works of art to depict the reality of a state-controlled existence where “Big Brother is Watching” would be a matter of fact and not a disquieting aberration.
The Soviet Union, by then under the control of Stalinist
ruthlessness, of course, dismissed them as propaganda. It was much later – in the
1970s, during the Brezhnev era – that Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago was published. It destroyed
the last vestiges of Soviet Union’s claim that the Soviet interpretation of
communism was a better and just system.
Describing the life in a Soviet labour camp between 1958 and
1968, Solzhenitsyn's book depicts the grim reality of life in Soviet Union – a life
without freedom, a life of perennial scarcity and a life where equality was a
mere notion. Within two decades of the publication of the book, the Soviet
Union was consigned to the trash bin of history, and it wasn’t a day sooner.
The pauperization of Soviet ideology and the rise of Reagan
were concomitant, and in the rapid collapse of the former lay the genesis of
the rapid rise of the latter. The relentless propaganda war that the
Reagan-Thatcher duo unleashed in the 1980s (Evil Empire, etc.) helped in
shifting the paradigm, and the pendulum swung to the right.
Globally, fiscal conservatism became the new normal; public spending
on essential services was no longer considered necessary, and was interpreted
as wasteful. Surprisingly, more than
Reagan and Thatcher, it was Bill Clinton and Tony Blair who abetted this
transformation.
By the mid-1990s, ideological left in the West (which was
radically different from Soviet interpretation of leftism) was confined only to
a few institutions and individuals. Insofar as the government policies were
concerned, the left was finished. Its total obliteration also led to the rise and
acceptance of globalization, the rise of China, and the Walmartization of the
world economy.
Twenty years later the world is beginning to come to grips
with the fallout of this process – the disparity between the haves and the
have-nots has pierced the stratosphere; unsurprisingly, statistics don’t capture
either the absurdity or the tragedy of this inequality. And that is only the
economic manifestation of the phenomenon.
The rise of religious fundamentalism, institutionalization
of racial discrimination, the utter disregard for the depletion of natural
resources, the devastation of the fragile ecosystems to make the rich richer are
among the political and sociocultural manifestations of the Rise of the Right.
These developments have had deeply disturbing ramifications, and have left a permanent
scar on people and societies.
Greece’s referendum last week, therefore, gave rise to hope to
many across the world that finally the leaders of Western Europe would
comprehend that the pendulum had begun to swing back, and that it was now time
to understand the human cost of the myopic policies that have been followed.
Will anything concrete emerge from it? The answer is an
unequivocal and emphatic no.
Labels:
#Greecereferendum
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)