During this week, I have been doing the rounds of art
museums in New York – The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), the Guggenheim Museum,
the Metropolitan Museum of Art – it’s simultaneously been an enriching and disturbing
experience.
It was enriching because for the first time I saw the original
art of the American abstract expressionists – the art form that began in New
York in post-World War II era. I was familiar with the two masters of this form
– Jackson Pollock, and Mark Rothko.
|
Jackson Pollock (MoMA) |
|
Marc Chagall (MoMA) |
|
Picasso (MoMA) |
MoMA has a permanent exhibition of the works of many others
from the genre; it also has original works of many other masters of modern art,
as does Guggenheim (Vasily Kandinsky) and the Met (Abstraction). It would take
a long time to carefully study all the art work housed in the galleries of these
museums.
And it was disturbing because there was absolutely no
representation of art from anywhere else except the western world. Perhaps
that is a minor quibble, or perhaps it isn’t. Nevertheless it weighed upon my
mind throughout the time I was in the midst of the western world’s iconic
artists.
Then I read the Met’s explanation of Abstraction: “Widespread
appropriation of artistic forms from Africa, the indigenous peoples of the
Americas, and other non- or preindustrial cultures encouraged modern artists to
embrace abstraction as a meaningful alternative to the European tradition of depicting
three-dimensional and realistic space and form. Many artists and designers
considered abstraction to be universal and egalitarian because of a viewer’s
appreciation of abstract art did not depend on learned knowledge of history or
literature. Throughout the early twentieth century, abstraction developed in
painting, sculpture, and design, ranging in style from geometric to organic,
with variations in between. Additionally, many modernists associated
abstraction with music, a form of expression that artists exalted as inherently
subjective in meaning and free from the constraints of realism.”
It would seem that the Western art establishment even in the 21st century assesses the world from a colonial (or at least a neo-colonial) prism. This was definitely true of a majority of
the important artists of the twentieth century. Postcolonial sensibilities many
have manifested in the adoption of raw imagery and rough-hewn art techniques of the
colonized world, but didn’t move the artists enough to make it the subject of
their work.
Of course, urban art, which is heavily politicized, is making significant inroads into this rarified world, and is transforming attitudes. It is in this context that the work of urban artists
such as Banksy needs to be viewed. His ongoing work on the Syrian refugee crises,
and his earlier work in Palestine are perhaps the first instances of an
established artist from the West charting a new artistic path.
But, that preoccupation with the neglect of the rest by the West has more to do with my heavily
politicized mind rather than the inherent merits of the museums. I concluded 2015 among
the best works of art that humankind has known.
Among the most fascinating works featured at the Met include the interpretation of the Three Graces by Manieree Dawson (American, 1887-1969), and a Roman copy of the Greek work.
|
Manieree Dawson's Three Graces
|
|
Roman copy of Three Graces |
Throughout the recorded history of western civilization, a
number of artists have interpreted the Three Graces. There were three Graces in
Greek Mythology: Aglaia, the Grace that symbolized Beauty, Euphrosyne, the
Grace of Delight and Thalia, the Grace of Blossom. The Graces were called
Charities in Greek, and Graces in Roman. According to Greek poet Pindar, these
enchanting goddesses were created to fill the world with pleasant moments and
goodwill. Usually the Graces were attending the Greek goddess of Beauty
Aphrodite and her companion Eros and loved dancing around in a circle to
Apollo's divine music, together with the Nymphs and the Muses.
Images:
http://www.manierredawson.com/museums/metropolitan-museum.htm
https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/2010.260
No comments:
Post a Comment